On 4/14/08, Jay R. Ashworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 03:24:02PM -0400, Matt Florell wrote: > > > > As for contributed code, we require a statement of "this is my code > > > > and the project can use it and redistribute it" from the author. > > > > Nothing very detailed at the moment because there are not many code > > > > contributors and the project is entirely GPL-based and is not > > > > dual-licensed. > > > > > > Yeah; I was just worried about someone getting pissy about your > > > relicensing from GPL to AGPL. Not that I expect it or anything... :-) > > > > I am fairly surprised that I have not heard a single negative comment > > about it from any members of our VICIDIAL community or anywhere else. > > > Well, I'm not, actually... the people who *like* the GPL (that's, > y'know, everyone except Trixter :-) would be more inclined to like > AGPL, I would think; it merely extends the letter to better reflect the > spirit -- which a lot of people think GPl3 does *not* do... > > > > There are actually other web-based projects that are moving to it as > > well(which is how I originally heard about it) and since it became an > > official OSI-approved Open Source License along with the special > > provisions that GPL made allowing for AGPL compatibility, there are > > more people talking about it in the last few months. > > > If OSI approved it don't *they* then have the "official" language?
Yes and no, they have the official language for AGPLv3, but not AGPLv2 which is the actual license that they first approved on March 12th. I can't find the exact version 2 draft that they approved, since it seems that they moved immediately to post version 3 on their website and just skipped version 2. MATT--- _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users