--On Wednesday, December 24, 2003 10:06 pm +0100 rnc Info Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Still, there seems to be a "you get what you pay for" theme to many of today's posts and this clearly applies to support on FWD. Naybe we should remove the signature from * that enables FWD to identify * systems :-)
That certainly seems the case for today's theme... It is certainly the right of any company or person to define the rules of their service. Since I don't pay for either Asterisk or FWD then I appreciate the service that is provided and try not to crusify them when things don't go right. This entire VoIP is still rather experimental. If I want guaranteed service then I'll pay some provider for it... THEN.. and only then will a service level be expected.
That's fair comment but I think FWD should have put a correct message on their system for asterisk users. It wouldn't have taken much effort.
FWD and * complement each other and should benefit from each other's success. Indeed * is cited on the FWD web site and mentioned by Jeff Pulver at his VON events. It seems a little unfortunate that FWD is assuming all * systems are a front for hundreds of users and banning them.
Iain
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
