On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Hans Witvliet <h...@a-domani.nl> wrote:
[snip] > I think i have to stick with mysql, as info is coming from other > applications, but perhaps some of the other code can be tweaked. > mysql is nice (lots of tiny programs writen for it), but i'm not > religious attached to it ;-) I should have been more clear. res_odbc has better support in Asterisk. We use MySQL as our back-end database. One benefit of using ODBC connectors is that you don't have to be religiously attached to the back-end. The SQL code in Asterisk is generic, and you could swap out for PostgreSQL or anything else that there is a ODBC connector for. > The amount of concurent calls will be small, but the amount of > pre-defined users is fair (75K) So perhaps i should consider a mix of > ldap and a DB. While we don't have that many users defined on any one system, I would test both independently. Both together sounds complex to troubleshoot when something breaks... -Jonathan -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
