On 9/10/07, Paulo Cavalcanti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 9/10/07, David O'Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi Paulo, all, > > > > I removed the ATrpms nvidia RPMs and installed an equivalent set of > > livna RPMs (containing the 7185 release drivers) and these worked fine > > for me. I assume that this is because the livna RPM provides > > nvidia_drv.so instead of nvidia_drv.o. > > > > I downloaded the livna rpms and I will see the difference. > The nvidia_drv.o is created by the nvidia installer. > Are you sure that only creating manually a symbolic link, something > like, nvidia_drv.so-> nvidia_drv.o, does not work? >
I looked at the nivida installer and there is both a nvidia_drv.o and a nvidia_drv.so However, ATrpms is including only nvidia_drv.o I changed the rpm to include both of them. I think we can keep both into the rpm. In case of problems, just remove nvidia_drv.o and keep only nvidia_drv.so For F7 x86_64: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/rpms/rpms74/ Can anyone test these rpms and post the result? I will post for F7 i386 tomorrow. Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ
_______________________________________________ atrpms-users mailing list atrpms-users@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
