On 9/10/07, Paulo Cavalcanti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 9/10/07, Paulo Cavalcanti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 9/10/07, David O'Shea < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Paulo, all, > > > > > > I removed the ATrpms nvidia RPMs and installed an equivalent set of > > > livna RPMs (containing the 7185 release drivers) and these worked fine > > > for me. I assume that this is because the livna RPM provides > > > nvidia_drv.so instead of nvidia_drv.o. > > > > > > > > I downloaded the livna rpms and I will see the difference. > > The nvidia_drv.o is created by the nvidia installer. > > Are you sure that only creating manually a symbolic link, something > > like, nvidia_drv.so-> nvidia_drv.o, does not work? > > > > > I looked at the nivida installer and there is both a nvidia_drv.o and a > nvidia_drv.so > However, ATrpms is including only nvidia_drv.o > > I changed the rpm to include both of them. I think we can keep both > into the rpm. In case of problems, just remove nvidia_drv.o and keep only > nvidia_drv.so > > For F7 x86_64: > > http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/rpms/rpms74/<http://people.atrpms.net/%7Epcavalcanti/rpms/rpms74/> > > Can anyone test these rpms and post the result? > > I will post for F7 i386 tomorrow.
For FC7 i386, the rpms are here: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/rpms/rpms7/ and the new source here: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/nvidia-graphics7185-1.0_7185-74.4.fc6.lcg.src.rpm Please, report the results. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ
_______________________________________________ atrpms-users mailing list atrpms-users@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
