On 17 Mar 2023, at 2:36, Tassilo Horn wrote: > Kourosh Kalayeh kay...@pm.me writes: > >>> I do, too, so just using those two shouldn't be problematic. BTW, >>> during key-val completion (through multi-prompt-key-value) I see no >>> sign of vertico/maginalia, i.e., no vertical display of completion >>> candidates but just standard Completions buffer on hitting TAB >>> multiple times. >> >> I think I was able to pin down the issue. As you suspect, it was not >> due to Vertico or Marginilia. I think it is due to orderless. With >> minimal orderless setup as below, the optional arguments to >> \includegraphics macro is not working as expected in AUCTeX. Any >> suggestion or workaround? > > I guess you could do something like > > (add-hook 'TeX-mode-hook > (lambda () > (setq-local completion-styles '(basic)))) > > i.e., ensure that orderless is not in `completion-styles' in TeX > buffers. Of course, then you'd not have orderless completion with > normal symbol (non-key-val) completion, too. > > Please also report it to the orderless maintainers. Tell them that > AUCTeX `multi-prompt-key-value' [1] seems to misbehave with orderless in > that it doesn't strictly complete key=val but also val=key, key=key, and > val=val. In a sense, orderless is doing what it advertises, ignoring > the order. But maybe they can find a fix. If not, I guess, AUCTeX can > add a workaround and let-bind completion-styles to a value without > orderless during multi-prompt-key-value. Please Cc me in the report by > mentioning me with @tsdh. > > Thanks, > Tassilo > > [1] http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/auctex.git/tree/multi-prompt.el#n183
Thank you Tassilo, and sorry for my late response. Sure, will do that. Kourosh
