On Fri, 25 Jun 2004, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote: > On Fri, 2004-06-25 at 23:18 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I've given some thought to a change in internal design. Introducing a > > threaded model in fact. But having lots of processes around and a > > cluttered mount table need to be considered, even with the current design. > > Tim Hockin and some other people at Sun are implementing an automounter > from scratch. I don't recall much about the design, other than that it > seemed a bit inspired by hotplug (i.e. run a program to handle a mount/ > unmount request). The only reaction I've seen was from HPA, who wasn't > terribly impressed. >
Yes. Based on the proposal refered to there. Additionally, they have developed a vfs expire extention to address the expiration requirements not covered in the original document. Last time I asked Mike he said it was going fairly well. They don't have clearance from Sun to release this atm so, as I said, not product as yet. Ian _______________________________________________ autofs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
