On Mon, 28 Jun 2004, Mike Waychison wrote:
Why should the user on :0 be special?
Cause this is the kind of policy I'd like to see :)
It doesnt make sense though. Eg, I remember in College the SPARCStation labs (for some reason) each only had one workstation with a floppy device. 9/10 the user using the floppy was not on :0.0.
I can imagine something similar today with Zip/Jazz/DVR-RW+packet UDF/$CHIC_REMOVABLE_MEDIA_DE_JOUR.
Yup. However, this doesn't connect nicely with mount(8). mount(8) only mounts as a user according to /etc/fstab rules, not by block device owner :\ Maybe this should be fixed up somehow.
Hmm, that's a decent point.
Sure, but 'who is allowed to trigger the mount'?
Whoever is allowed to access the device surely?
-- Mike Waychison Sun Microsystems, Inc. 1 (650) 352-5299 voice 1 (416) 202-8336 voice http://www.sun.com
regards, -- Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Key ID: 64A2FF6A warning: do not ever send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fortune: Victory uber allies!
_______________________________________________ autofs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
