>>>>> "Brian" == Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Brian> If the autotools were to recognize these pattern rules, scan Brian> the source and automatically generate portable rules for me, I Brian> would be a very happy customer indeed :) Sorry, I thought that was what we were talking about. In terms of just using it, yeah, this doesn't work atm. Having automake recognize GNU make-style '%' rules isn't totally out of the question, IMO. It might be tricky to make this totally reliable, I'm not sure. (E.g., if you considered something like extending the built-in dependency tracking code to support user rules...) Alternatively, code to directly support moc would also be fine. Tom
