* Peter Johansson wrote on Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 05:41:40AM CET: > On 2/25/10 3:14 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > >Changing that to 63 is probably a good idea (but we'd need to check > >whether throughout autotools there is no expectance of the other value), > Is anyone more than autoreconf and the missing script calling > automake and thereby possibly reacting to the return value?
The Autoconf, Automake, and Libtool testsuites at the least. Cheers, Ralf
