On 02/13/2011 11:12 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > [ Cross post; Reply-To and Mail-Followup-To set. Please followup to > the automake list only, to avoid excessive spammage. Thank you. ] > > Hello everyone, > > I've been advertising debbugs before, I think we should be a good > example. So, two proposals: > > 1) Autoconf and Libtool should also use debbugs. > > bug-automake has switched a few months ago, and I find it helpful to > avoid losing reports. Given that we never have enough time on our > hands, it becomes more important to not lose track. > > See http://debbugs.gnu.org/ and linked pages for details.
Seems like it might be reasonable for autoconf. However, my biggest concern is that right now, I filter both autoconf and automake messages into the same mail folder, but debbugs anonymizes which list a bug is being reported against (that is, the To: is rewritten as ###@debbugs.gnu.org, so there is no longer any mention of 'automake' in any of the normal mail headers). While I could probably force filtering to take place on X-Debbugs-Original-To:, that still doesn't solve the problem of no visual indication on which list a bug is reported against. Any ideas on how to resolve that issue? -- Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com +1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
