Matthew,
sorry was replying to DED rather than CA
would that be double indemnity ~:"
cheers
Jonathan Chetwynd
On 13 Jun 2006, at 09:20, Matthew Somerville wrote:
Jonathan Chetwynd wrote:
given the BBC's remit might this mean they need to ensure that they
have copyright clearance, if they need it?
--
"The Disability Equality Duty will apply, from December 2006, to
the BBC , Channel 4 and the Welsh Fourth Channel (S4C). "
Right, but that's irrelevant to my point. That simply means that
those organisations have to put the effort in to promoting disability
equality, it has nothing to do with when you can legally make copies
of stuff without infringing someone's copyright.
--
Sorry, I don't understand. The whole point of the Copyright (Visually
Impaired Persons) Act is that it enables (some) people to make
accessible versions of (some) copyright material for visually
impaired people without needing to clear it with the copyright
holder, whoever they are. So who would the BBC need to ensure they
have copyright clearance with, and what for?
ATB,
Matthew
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe,
please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/
mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-
archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/