On Jan 9, 2008 4:11 PM, Dave Crossland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 09/01/2008, Frank Wales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > He sounds like he'd be a hoot to have around, as long as you're not > > one of those cheeseburger-eating, IDE-loving, PHP douchebags, as he > > might call them. > > > > (Which I'm not, by the way, if you're reading this, Zed. I'm more > > your coffee-drinking, emacs-loving, meta-programming geezer.) > > "State of Ajax > > * HTTP sucks > * Needs to be a reset > * Semantic Web: "Einsteins brain on a crack whores body isn't > going to happen" > * I'm waiting for someone to blind-side the entire Web stack" > > Silverlight take-up has been poor; Flash seems widespread but limited > by its proprietary nature; XUL+etc is free but uptake also poor. > > Could Gnash blind-side the entire Web stack? > >
Surely Gnash is just sitting on top of the existing web stack? - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
