On 09/01/2008, Iain Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Silverlight take-up has been poor; Flash seems widespread but limited > > by its proprietary nature; XUL+etc is free but uptake also poor. > > > > Could Gnash blind-side the entire Web stack? > > Surely Gnash is just sitting on top of the existing web stack?
Consider the GTK Gnash that runs standalone, not inside a web browser as a plugin. Zed's comments struck me as being about "RIA" style non-web network application infrastructures. Each of the proprietary software company heavyweight contenders (MS, Adobe, Mozilla) is flawed in some way, but Gnash seems it could take Adobe's format but leave the proprietary flaw. -- Regards, Dave - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
