On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 5:57 AM, Brian Butterworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> 1. Rights issues actually mean we've nothing really to put onto BitTorrent
> > (and we're trying to change this by the way)
>
>  In fact, of couse, BitTorrent
> is a file-transfer protocol.  You could, of course, stick everything that you 
> have on the iPlayer and podcasts and so forth.
>
> You could - and I know it probably makes no sense other than theortically
> - use BitTorrent alongside KDM, because the DRM is 100% separate from the
> file transfer.
>

Indeed; fair enough. It's a good question to ask why Kontiki, and why not
BitTorrent. I don't know the answer.


> 2. For those larger files that we do have rights to (like podcasts), the
> > leading podcatchers, like iTunes, don't come with Torrent support
>
> But if you don't put your content out there on torrents, there is no need
> for anyone like Apple to build it into iTunes.
>

True, but I'm not sure we'll singlehandedly change the world. Miro has
BitTorrent built-in, and it'll be interesting to see how many big media
companies use it.

3. Actually, we've a ton of bandwidth available anyway; and because of the
> > way our bandwidth is charged (and used), it doesn't actually reap an awful
> > lot of savings for us anyway
>
> The issue here is that using BitTorrent would allow the content to be
> spread all over the world.  There is a certain polticial misunderstanding
> about bandwidth which always says that BBC content should be blocked outside
> the UK BECAUSE of the bandwidth restrictions.
>

Not sure it's for bandwidth reasons. It's more likely to be (speculating)
that it's funded differently, different rights agreements (some of our
non-DRM'd podcasts are not available overseas, for example).



> 4. BitTorrent adds complexity for reporting and monitoring usage of our
> > content, which is one of the ways we can ensure that you're getting good
> > value from your licence-fee
>
>
>  True.  Part of the point of BitTorrent is the privacy it offers the user!
>

False - it offers virtually no privacy... as the RIAA is only too aware! ;)

I don't think that BitTorrent is a panacea, I just think that it
> demonstrably works very well, is well tested, has many clients and should be
> an option.
>

Agree. Cheers for the mail.

Reply via email to