On January 28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> Signaling: (error "bbdb: cannot access the name field this way")
> signal(error ("bbdb: cannot access the name field this way"))
> error("bbdb: cannot access the %s field this way" name)
> (if (memq property (quote ...)) (error "bbdb: cannot access the %s field this way"
>property))
> bbdb-record-getprop(["Christina" "Burchardt" nil "TonArt" nil nil
>("[EMAIL PROTECTED]") ((creation-date . "2000-08-23") (timestamp . "2000-10-24"))
>["Christina Burchardt" nil #<marker at 231 in .bbdb> nil]] name)
> (setq tmp (bbdb-record-getprop record (car fields)) done (and tmp
> (string-match ... tmp)) fields (cdr fields))
As best I can tell, your .bbdb file has a notes field called "name" in
at least one of the records. This is colliding with BBDB's "real" name
field, causing the stacktrace above. Probably the easiest way to check
this is to see if there's a mention of "name" in the second line of
the .bbdb file (user-fields: ....); failing that, search the file
itself for "name . " and see what you come up with. If this /is/ the
case, you'll need to hand-edit the .bbdb file to change "name" to
something else. I'm not really sure how you'd get your .bbdb into this
state in the first place, btw!
Cheers,
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me.
I really need to reinstate the witty comments, dammit.
_______________________________________________
bbdb-info mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info
