On Mon Apr 4 2011 Leo wrote: > I personally think it would be far more productive to worry about > backward compatibility later on. For example, we could add a new > org-bbdb3 module to org mode and leave the old as it is.
While I do not know any details of how BBDB is hooked into / interfacing org mode, I expect that Leo's suggestion is probably the cleanest way to go (and similar for other packages that might have a bbdb interface). Currently I am compiling the ChangeLog for the round of changes that I worked on recently, which I want to put into the repository in a couple of days. Beyond these new changes, I am kind of "running out of ideas" what else could / should be done to upgrade BBDB to an up-to-date package of software, i.e., I think that by now I have done more or less everything that should be done to bring BBDB up to date. So I want to declare a feature freeze for my own BBDB hacking (unless someone else proposes some good ideas what should still be modified / upgraded in BBDB -- suggestions welcome!). There are probably still various bugs in the new code that I have overlooked up to now. So I'd like to wait some time. Then it might be a good time for a first proper release of the new BBDB. Roland ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Create and publish websites with WebMatrix Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself; WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf _______________________________________________ bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
