On 5/8/07, Deepayan Sarkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/8/07, Runa B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jamil Ahmed wrote: > > > On 4/30/07, das <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 15:18 +0600, Jamil Ahmed wrote: > > >> > > >>> [ `] => ZWNJ > > >>> [~] => ZWJ > > >>> > > >>> > > >> +1 > > >> > > > > > > Anyone else? DS/SDG/RunaB/Golam/Others?? > > > > > I guess I had proposed this..mostly for the ra-japhala issue as mentioned > > by sayam. > > > > [~] => ZWNJ > > [ `] => ZWJ > > > > I'd still go with this. The ZWJ is currently on "shift+=" (or +) and it'll > > be easier to write, > > if it doesn't need a shift key. > > I'm not sure I understand. Are you proposing that we have the rarely > used (only for ra-japhala) ZWJ bound to a non-shift key and the fairly > common ZWNJ bound to a shift key? Why? > > Why are we not trying to use [\]? It seems pointless to have it free.
Yes, we can use [`] and [\], both without pressing shift key. :-)) `Jamil ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Bengalinux-core mailing list Bengalinux-core@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bengalinux-core
