Hi Paolo, Paolo Vecchi píše v Po 14. 03. 2022 v 20:59 +0100:
> It's true that through the 80s and 90s software development was > different but I can assure you that there were levels of complexity > that > aren't that different from today's systems and the tolerance for > errors > were probably a lot narrower. You really don't have to assure me. I started programming 35 years ago, I was there in the 80's and 90's, so I can compare with the present. > Maybe a small number of passionate and capable developers will be > able > to fix the CVEs and bring LOOL to a state where it could work well > with > the features left since the fork for those that don't need new fancy > features. The most important "new fancy features" are in the area of making the editing more fluent, optimized & pleasant, do you really think there are people who don't need them? > The point is that we don't know until we open the repository and let > people know that is available with all the relevant warnings. It is git, anybody can clone it & work on it if they want. If there were passionate and capable developers interested in this, they'd be bombarding the development mailing list with their patches the last >12 months; passionate and capable developers always find their way to get their code integrated one way or the other. But I'm not aware of any such patches. All the best, Kendy -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/ Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy