Hi all, On 02/12/2022 23:42, Cor Nouws wrote:
Hi,Until someone can explain me that it is beneficial to TDF to compete with contributing members of the ecosystem, I see this attempt from Andreas as not at all interesting.
Nobody can explain to you "that it is beneficial to TDF to compete with contributing members of the ecosystem" because it isn't and TDF doesn't do it.
Now that that is sorted. Does Article 8 of our statutes sound more interesting to you?Isn't your and Thorsten's behaviour leading to think that there is a potential conflict of interests?
Cheers, Cor
Ciao Paolo
Andreas Mantke wrote on 02/12/2022 23:38:Hi all, Am 02.12.22 um 13:52 schrieb Thorsten Behrens:+1 (thanks a lot for all the good feedback, feels great to get this moving!)this vote was done by an owner and executive director of a software company who /which have an declared interest to influence the direction of the LibreOffice development by the in-house developers. The in-house developers will remove a lot of advantage from the tendering budget and could work on parts of the code, that otherwise could be a tender in the future, on which his company might bid. Thus the voter has a non arguable Conflict of Interest on the topic of this vote. Because of this he has to abstain from this vote. His vote is null. Because of his Conflict of Interest on this topic he cannot vote and should not unduly influence the decision. The comments on this list and the attacks are very problematic. Regards, Andreas -- ## Free Software Advocate ## Plone add-on developer ## My blog: http://www.amantke.de/blog
-- Paolo Vecchi - Member of the Board of Directors The Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 Berlin, DE Gemeinnützige rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts Legal details: https://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
