At 04:32 PM 10/9/03 +1000, Russell Chapman wrote:
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:

with no indication of their correct order.

That's what those numbers punched in columns 72-80 were for . . .
Yep - I never made that mistake again...

:-)



Of course, that was supposed to read "columns *73* through 80" . . .



That Would Have Been Really Annoying If I'd Done It While Punching Cards On An IBM Model 026 Card Punch, Which Didn't Print The Character It Punched At The Top Of The Card Like The Model 029 Did Maru




-- Ronn! :)

_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to