On 10 November 2010 23:29, Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 11/10/2010 03:28 PM, Reuben Thomas wrote: >> On 10 November 2010 22:08, Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> On 11/10/2010 03:02 PM, Reuben Thomas wrote: >>>> Attached, against current git. >>> >>> Thanks. Can you convince your mailer to send patches as mime type >>> text/plain, so that they're easier to review inline? >> >> My mailer is web Gmail, which doesn't seem to be controllable like >> that, but I give it a hint using a different file extension (e.g. >> .patch.txt). Is that an improvement? Experiment shows that if I do >> that it does indeed use text/plain. > > Yes, that's acceptable. Also workable is getting 'git send-email' > hooked up to send patches through gmail SMTP or IMAP (see > git.git:Documentation/SubmittingPatches for some hints on working with > gmail).
Thanks for the pointer. I've already signed a copyright waiver for autoconf, so no need to worry about that. -- http://rrt.sc3d.org
