On Thu, 23 Sep 1999, OKUJI Yoshinori wrote:
> I have already suggested the same idea in this list, but some
> persons told me that using Stage 1.5 would be enough. And, I agreed
> with them. So, I'd like to say to you, just like they said to me, "Why
> do you want to change the mechanism, though you can use Stage 1.5 and
> that's enough for you?"
Yes, but wouldn't it be nice to have LBA support and other devices to be
supported all integrated into a single stage1? Only keeping track of 1
block would free up (comparatively) a lot of space for code.
