Your message dated Fri, 31 Mar 2000 23:15:16 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line version 0.5.94 is available in unstable, closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Dec 1999 21:31:03 +0000
Received: (qmail 20287 invoked from network); 6 Dec 1999 21:31:02 -0000
Received: from jagor.srce.hr ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 6 Dec 1999 21:31:02 -0000
Received: (from jrodin@localhost)
by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.0/8.9.0) id WAA02084
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 6 Dec 1999 22:30:58 +0100 (MET)
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 1999 22:30:58 +0100
From: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: grub: won't recognize ext2 partition when there are *fat ones in front
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95i
Package: grub
Version: 0.5.93.1
Severity: normal
Hello,
GRUB, when invoked with just 'grub' on a working system, which has an
IBM's IDE hard disk, 15.2GB in size, with this partition table:
Disk /dev/hda: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 1869 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/hda1 * 1 256 2056288+ b Win95 FAT32
/dev/hda2 257 1869 12956422+ f Win95 Extended (LBA)
/dev/hda5 257 1562 10490413+ b Win95 FAT32
/dev/hda6 1563 1863 2417751 83 Linux native
/dev/hda7 1864 1869 48163+ 82 Linux swap
(printout by normal linux fdisk)
... won't recognize/use the ext2 partition :( I tried 'root (hd0,5)',
but just that causes "Disk read error". I tried to use the completion
(BTW what a swell feature for a boot loader! :), but that caused this:
grub> root (hd0,<pressed_TAB>
Disk read error
Possible partitions are:
Partition num: 0, Filesystem type is fat, partition type 0xb
Partition num: 4, Filesystem type is fat, partition type 0xb
Disk read error
I don't understand what exactly is wrong, but I've had another person
tell me that he experienced the same behaviour - Grub wouldn't read
ext2 partition, and he also had some FAT-like partitions before the
ext2 one(s) in the partition table.
What am I doing wrong?
TIA!
BTW I still haven't managed to get Grub to work, the diskette reports
"Read error" and halt prior to booting (tried two disks, a 1.44M and
a 720K one just in case, but both died)... is there a mailing list
for Grub users where I can ask for help?
--
enJoy -*/\*- don't even try to pronounce my first name
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 52080-close) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Mar 2000 21:00:21 +0000
Received: (qmail 1789 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2000 21:00:16 -0000
Received: from cibalia.gkvk.hr ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2000 21:00:16 -0000
Received: from joy by cibalia.gkvk.hr with local (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian))
id 12b8lA-0002LX-00; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 23:15:16 +0200
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 23:15:16 +0200
From: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: version 0.5.94 is available in unstable, closing
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0pre2i
Hi,
I found the newer version in unstable distribution a few days ago, so
I'll close the bug now (as the submitter).
Thanks again.
--
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
