At 28 May 2002 18:37:33 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote: > > The attached file isn't included in the mail. I think this is true in > > the Patch Manager as well. > > Unfortunate, but a common failing of such systems (bugzilla has the same > problem)
I talked about that issue with the BTS maintainer Laurent Julliard. He has done an enhancement, that is to say, a notification will include a URL pointing to an attachment, but he wants to consider more about including an attachment in a notification. See <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=491&group_id=11>, for more details. > True, but most patches for grub don't tend to be that large, so are > generally handled by either inlining them into the message or attaching > them. Most mail clients have no problem making the patch easy to read > over in either fashion and reply with comments inlined in the patch. At > least none of the many that I've used or experimented with have had > difficulty with this. I meant by "the effort" the effort to extract a patch from a message and submit it to the BTS. One of the reasons why I'd like to use the BTS is that I sometimes pass over important messages unfortunately, so I have no confidence to do that manually. It would be helpful for me that every patch is stored in a database automatically. Thanks, Okuji _______________________________________________ Bug-grub mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub
