Because savannah.gnu.org added support to have a bug tracking system per project, I think it might be easier to maintain the project, if we shift some of the matainance work from this mailing list to Savannah. I objected to the use of Savannah several months ago, because it was too primitive, but it now looks excellent.
So I made a prototype of the Bug Tracking System. You can see it via <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?group_id=68>. If you are on the list of developers, you can see the difference between non-admin user and admin user by logging in. The reason why I call it "a prototype" is that the BTS is quite customizable, so we can fit it to our needs more radically. If we migrate the main part of the maintenance work to Savannah, these would happen: 1. Advise users to use the BTS rather than this list when they send bug reports. 2. Advise users to submit patches to the BTS rather than this list when they send patches. I prefer the BTS to the Patch Manager, because the BTS can be used as an alternative to the Patch Manager, and the BTS has much more features than the Patch Manager. BTW, I'm not thinking of using the Support Manager, because I don't think it is superior to communications via e-mail. Any comments? Okuji _______________________________________________ Bug-grub mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub
