On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Andrew Bernard <andrew.bern...@gmail.com> wrote: > Don't you have to provide an argument for \mark, I thought? > > I am not familiar with 2.18.2, but in 2.19.48 you do:
Yep. I think \mark requiring an argument explains the errors in the examples fully: - The first error it saying that the argument you gave to \mark was wrong - Lilypond kept trying to make sense of things and kept processing. Since the argument to \mark was already used there is now 1 too few beats in that measure. I think lilypond is behaving as expected here. You might be trying to do \mark \default or \mark "C" instead. -----Jay Anderson _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
