DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41449>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41449 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-21 14:38 ------- Following workaround will allow you to specify a generic lock provider on global level. However I don't yet understand if it make sense to have it declared globally. Subversion uses this directive and uses it inside Location directive. Bjorn, can you explain how you are using DAVGenericLockDB directive. Index: modules/dav/lock/mod_dav_lock.c =================================================================== --- modules/dav/lock/mod_dav_lock.c (revision 500367) +++ modules/dav/lock/mod_dav_lock.c (working copy) @@ -80,7 +80,8 @@ static const command_rec dav_lock_cmds[] = { /* per server */ - AP_INIT_TAKE1("DAVGenericLockDB", dav_lock_cmd_davlockdb, NULL, ACCESS_CONF, + AP_INIT_TAKE1("DAVGenericLockDB", dav_lock_cmd_davlockdb, NULL, + ACCESS_CONF|RSRC_CONF, "specify a lock database"), { NULL } [ -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
