> Anyone using CAF is probably doing new development, right? Why not put a > line in the sand, say 5.8.x as a minimum and move on... > > So suggests the guy still running 5.6.1 on one of his busiest servers...
:) I'm happy drawing the line at 5.6.1, but 5.8.x is too high, IMO. For instance, RHEL 2.1 (which I still use in production) uses 5.6.1. Also, I imagine that lots of people on virtual hosts will be using 5.6.1... Michael --- Michael Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ caf mailing list caf@lpi.org http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caf
