Its not bitching if you are willing to point out where the problems are and perhaps offer some solutions to those problems. That's called contributing in my books. As for the API it is automatically generated via doxygen. But just because it is auto generated means it should be poor. So again, some places where you think the API is weak would help as you are probably not the only person who has experienced issues with it.
-Mark On Jan 3, 3:47 pm, Steven Wright <rhythmicde...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah. I am pretty sure the docs are auto created probably like Java Doc. > But I cant really bitch too much about what is essentially a free framework. > > -----Original Message----- > From: cake-php@googlegroups.com [mailto:cake-...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf > > Of brian > Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2009 3:43 PM > To: cake-php@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: API > > On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 3:18 PM, rhythmicde...@gmail.com > <rhythmicde...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Ahh I dont want to be all whiny about it :) > > > Essentially if there are options the options should be listed. > > Agreed. The API docs are a misery to wade through at times. Especially for > figuring out things like $options. > > It'd also be nice if there were a few comment blocks *within* some of the > class methods. I do realise that that wouldn't be trivial to deal with, > though. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
