On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 6:58 PM, mark_story <mark.st...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Its not bitching if you are willing to point out where the problems > are and perhaps offer some solutions to those problems. That's called > contributing in my books. As for the API it is automatically > generated via doxygen. But just because it is auto generated means it > should be poor. So again, some places where you think the API is weak > would help as you are probably not the only person who has experienced > issues with it. >
I think there's a source documentation problem throughout. I don't think it's a matter of any one file. Perhaps that's a decision the devs made to keep the files slim, although I'm unaware of any significant impact lots of comments has on performance. I doubt it's relevant. There have been times when I've been studying some method and, once the clue fairy appears, have thought that a particular inline comment or explanation at the top of the method would help considerably. But I doubt that Trac submissions just for source comment additions would be welcomed if too many people did so. Perhaps I'm wrong; I don't kow how the devs feel about that. As with any code source, though, a bit (well, more than a bit) of effort does, eventually, lead to a more comprehensive understanding of the framework. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
