Oh good!
Which mlib devel repository are you using? If you scroll up through the
errors, can you find the first error message, and does it say anything
useful?
Cheers
Jack
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017, 2:56 PM Xavier Bosch <bruixa.aburrid...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi all,
> Thank you Jack for your reply I followed your advice and tested the
> one_gbe "yellow block". It does not give me an error in the compilation but
> it does in the synthesis using XPS.
> At the beginning of the compilation it says that:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *############################### Block objects creation
> ###############################misc_ports = app_clk: {[1] 'in'
> 'sys_clk'} mac_tx_rst: {[1] 'in'
> 'one_geb_xb_one_GbE_app_tx_rst'}misc_ports = app_clk: {[1] 'in'
> 'sys_clk'} mac_tx_rst: {[1] 'in' 'one_geb_xb_one_GbE_app_tx_rst'}
> mac_rx_rst: {[1] 'in' 'one_geb_xb_one_GbE_app_rx_rst'}*
>
> and after a while it gives the following error:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Error found in mapping process, exiting...Errors found during the mapping
> phase. Please see map report file for moredetails. Output files will not
> be written.Design Summary--------------Number of errors : 86Number of
> warnings : 4ERROR:Xflow - Program map returned error code 2. Aborting
> flow execution...gmake: *** [__xps/system_routed] Error 1ERROR:EDK -
> Error while running "gmake -f system.make bits".: XPS failed.*
>
> Any idea what I could be doing wrong?
> Has anyone worked with that "yellow block" recently?
> Is there any example available?
> Thank you,
> XB
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 4:43 PM Jack Hickish <jackhick...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Xavier,
>>
>> The ROACH2 (unlike the ROACH1) has a dedicated 1GbE connection straight
>> to the FPGA fabric -- it's the "other" RJ45 connector in addition to the
>> one you're using to talk katcp. You can access it using the one_gbe yellow
>> block -- I think this is probably the way to go.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Jack
>>
>> On Mon, 19 Jun 2017 at 16:39 Xavier Bosch <bruixa.aburrid...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have a system that generates ~100 Mbit/s data throughput in a ROACH2
>>> board.
>>>
>>> Until now I have been using the KATCP and software registers to read
>>> those values at a much smaller data rate. The only option that I found in
>>> the documentation to use the design at full resolution are the 10 GbE
>>> boards, that we already have in hand. The 10 GbE boards look to me that is
>>> a little overkill for what I would like to do. Is there any other method to
>>> get data out from a ROACH2 board faster than the software register but
>>> slower than the 10 GbE boards?
>>>
>>> I am thinking in something like an USB 2.0 port (max 480 Mbit/s) or a
>>> 1GbE connection.
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> XB
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "casper@lists.berkeley.edu" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to casper+unsubscr...@lists.berkeley.edu.
>>> To post to this group, send email to casper@lists.berkeley.edu.
>>>
>>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"casper@lists.berkeley.edu" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to casper+unsubscr...@lists.berkeley.edu.
To post to this group, send email to casper@lists.berkeley.edu.
