:)

so you would also do something like the example from the link shows,
but just remove the "FindAll" ?

On Jan 26, 12:20 pm, Ken Egozi <egoz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> my take:
> externally the domain API will expose specialised repositories for aggregate
> roots. (not all of them should have Save, and a generic FindAll is not
> informative imo)
> internally, in the repository implementations, they'd use ARMediator (or NH
> queries) to retrieve manipulate data
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Colin Ramsay <colinram...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Well you wouldn't necessarily have to make a repo for every entity because
> > you'd have a generic Repo<T> you could use. However you might create (as an
> > example) a UserRepo : BaseRepo<User> with a FindByUsername method as a
> > little syntactic sugar.
>
> > I think many people would use a container such as windsor to avoid having
> > to manually instantiate their repositories.
>
> > On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Mark Jensen <don...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> Hi
>
> >> From what i can read on the internet people do really like this
> >> combination due to the placement of the persitance logic.
>
> >> how ever, i know that Castles AR has something callsed
> >> ActiveRecordMediator which seems to be the solution to the problem
> >> above. (i also know ayendes rhino commons which also have an
> >> implementation of the repository pattern).
>
> >> The questions are.
>
> >> 1. Will i lose something if i stop inheritting from ActiveRecordBase
> >> and use ActiveRecordMediatior instead? (to me it seems like i will get
> >> a lot more functionality/control)
>
> >> 2. Can someone me how to implement the Repository pattern with
> >> ActiveRecordMediator. I have found this example here
>
> >>http://www.lostechies.com/blogs/johnteague/archive/2008/05/27/using-d...
>
> >> but to me it seems like I would have to make a Repository (and inherit
> >> from BaseRepository) for every Aggregate and then I need to
> >> instantiate the Repository it when i want to use it.
>
> >> Is there a better way of doing this?
>
> >> :)
>
> >> best regards,
> >> Mark
>
> --
> Ken 
> Egozi.http://www.kenegozi.com/bloghttp://www.delver.comhttp://www.musicglue.comhttp://www.castleproject.orghttp://www.gotfriends.co.il
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-project-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
castle-project-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to