Another con of (3) is LinqToSql is dead 
(http://ayende.com/Blog/archive/2008/10/31/microsoft-kills-linq-to-sql.aspx)




________________________________
From: James Curran <james.cur...@gmail.com>
To: castle-project-users@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, 28 May, 2009 2:38:14 PM
Subject: Re: Why use ActiveRecord For LINQ??


But I think that changes the terminology more than the underlying question.

We have the options:

1)  AR -> NH ->  MSSQL (plus others, which we'll ignore for now)
2)  AR  -> LINQ -> NH -> MSSQL, et al.
3)  LINQ -> MSSQL

What are the pro & cons of each option.

One con of (3) is that it's primarily limited to MSSQL (although
providers for other DBs are available at varying stability), but
that's essentially a binary option:  It's either irrelevant (if you
are using MSSQL) or immediately disqualifying (if you use some other
DB)

-- 
Truth,
    James


On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 12:10 AM, Markus Zywitza
<markus.zywi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Wrong question, wrong answer...
>
> It's neither Linq2SQL nor Linq2objects. L2SQL is not only LINQ but a
> LINQ provider on top of MS mapping wizards. LINQ2AR is a wrapper
> around LINQ2NH (or NHLinq), which are LINQ providers for NHibernate.
> In the end, it means that you can use ActiveRecord with the powers of
> NHibernate and the IntelliSense of a LINQ-Provider.



      Need a Holiday? Win a $10,000 Holiday of your choice. Enter 
now.http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylc=X3oDMTJxN2x2ZmNpBF9zAzIwMjM2MTY2MTMEdG1fZG1lY2gDVGV4dCBMaW5rBHRtX2xuawNVMTEwMzk3NwR0bV9uZXQDWWFob28hBHRtX3BvcwN0YWdsaW5lBHRtX3BwdHkDYXVueg--/SIG=14600t3ni/**http%3A//au.rd.yahoo.com/mail/tagline/creativeholidays/*http%3A//au.docs.yahoo.com/homepageset/%3Fp1=other%26p2=au%26p3=mailtagline
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-project-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
castle-project-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to