Hi Krzysztof Yes I will do that tonight - I will try to base it on the WcfFacility.Tests code and will email it. I have seen mention before of git push/pull something-or-other but I have never done it before so I will stick to email unless someone can send me a link on how to send my test code straight to git?
Thank you Adam Langley Please consider the environment before printing this email! From: castle-project-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:castle-project-users@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Krzysztof Kozmic Sent: Wednesday, 11 May 2011 10:21 a.m. To: castle-project-users@googlegroups.com Cc: krzysz...@kozmic.pl Subject: RE: Wcf Facility (server) can not correctly resolve open generic decorators Can you provide a failing test with the reproduction On 11/05/2011 8:17 AM, "Adam Langley" <alang...@winscribe.com> wrote: > Hi Craig, > > Thanks for that - I will give it a try ASAP. > I thought it might be something like this - I noticed that when I forced a > local resolution to occur, then a final 'ComponentRegistered' event was > fired, which reported a 'closed generic' component... specialized to the > generic argument (so in this case, IDecorator<IServiceNoDependencies>) - but > it was not added to the list of 'registered components'. > I dont know enough about Castle to comprehend what kind of lifecycle is going > on under the hood - it would be ideal if the WCF facility was able to open > hosts for these components without 'eager' resolution. > > Thanks for the help Craig, > > Adam Langley > > > Please consider the environment before printing this email! > > From: castle-project-users@googlegroups.com > [mailto:castle-project-users@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Craig Neuwirt > Sent: Wednesday, 11 May 2011 7:53 a.m. > To: castle-project-users@googlegroups.com > Cc: krzysz...@kozmic.pl > Subject: Re: Wcf Facility (server) can not correctly resolve open generic > decorators > > Adam, > > I believe the problem relates to the open-generic registration. The Wcf > Facility waits for the service to be in the ready state before it opens the > host. In this case, the container shows the ServiceGenericDependency > component as waiting for the IDecorator dependency. It would be nice for the > container to handle this properly. I have seen this before and added an > option to open the service host eagerly. This will not wait for the component > to be reported as valid before opening the host. In your example, it resolved > the issue > > var wcfFacility=XXXX > wcfFacility.Services.OpenServiceHostsEagerly = true; > > cheers, > craig > > > On May 7, 2011, at 1:24 AM, Adam Langley wrote: > > > Dear Castle groups, > > I have a WCF service which has a single constructor dependency - this > dependency is 'generically decorated'. > > i.e. its constructor looks like this: > > public ServiceGenericDependency(IDecorator<IServiceNoDependencies> arg2) > { > } > > My 'decorator' constructor looks like this: > public Decorator(T arg) > { > } > Castle has the typeof(IDecorator<>) registration, and the > typeof(IServiceNoDependencies) registered. > PROBLEM: The WCF Facility fails to create the server. > IF I add a default constructor to my decorator class, then everything works. > IF I resolve the WCF service on the server (as a local component, i.e. take > WCFFacility out of the equation) then everything works. > I have included a test program below - just reference WcfFacility + Castle. > This is quite an urgent issue for me. > Thank you! > using Castle.Windsor; > using Castle.MicroKernel.Registration; > using Castle.Facilities.WcfIntegration; > using System.ServiceModel; > namespace DecoratorChains > { > class Program > { > static IWindsorContainer container; > static void Main(string[] args) > { > container = new WindsorContainer() > .AddFacility<WcfFacility>(); > // this is my decorator, it is capable of decorating any service. > container.Register(Component.For(typeof(IDecorator<>)).ImplementedBy(typeof(Decorator<>))); > container.Register( > Component.For<IServiceGenericDependency>().ImplementedBy<ServiceGenericDependency>().LifeStyle.Transient > .AsWcfService(new DefaultServiceModel().AddEndpoints( > WcfEndpoint.BoundTo(new NetTcpBinding()) > .At("net.tcp://localhost/Operations") > ) > ) > ); > // this is my service that WILL BE decorated, then used as a constructor > argument. > container.Register(Component.For<IServiceNoDependencies>().UsingFactoryMethod(() > => new ServiceNoDependencies())); > > var client = ChannelFactory<IServiceGenericDependency>.CreateChannel( > new NetTcpBinding(), new EndpointAddress("net.tcp://localhost/Operations")); > // this passes > var cc = container.Resolve<IServiceGenericDependency>(); > > // this fails > client.DoSomething(); > } > } > interface IServiceNoDependencies > { > } > class ServiceNoDependencies : IServiceNoDependencies > { > } > interface IDecorator<T> > where T : class > { > } > class Decorator<T> : IDecorator<T> > where T : class > { > /// <summary> > /// Remove this constructor and all tests will pass > /// </summary> > /// <param name="arg"></param> > public Decorator(T arg) > { > } > } > [ServiceContract] > interface IServiceGenericDependency > { > [OperationContract] > void DoSomething(); > } > class ServiceGenericDependency : IServiceGenericDependency > { > public ServiceGenericDependency(IDecorator<IServiceNoDependencies> arg2) > { > } > public void DoSomething() > { > } > } > } > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to castle-project-users@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > castle-project-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to castle-project-users@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > castle-project-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to castle-project-users@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > castle-project-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
