Unless I'm missing a subtle difference, these are the changes we did a few weeks back immediately after 1.2 was released. I even used mogrify to add a "See http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 for license information." comment to the images. There wasn't enough room to store the entire license as a comment, so I improvised a bit (there was no direction on how to handle this in the FAQ/etc).
Thanks, /dev/mrg -----Original Message----- From: Bill Dudney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 12:42 AM To: [email protected] Subject: headers discussion HI All, One last thread tonight... I wanted to give everyone a heads up to something I just noticed [1]. It is a new policy for the license comments in src files. The discussion is happening on the leagal-discuss [2] lists now as to what time frame this will be required in. I've read Sep 1st and that it might be postponed but either way I think we will have to conform before the 3.0 release is ready to go. Anyone have any bandwidth to tackle this change? TTFN, -bd- [1]http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html [2]http://tinyurl.com/m6x3u
