That would be great if its already done (and it probably is from the
sound of it). I just saw the chatter on the Geronimo list and figured
I'd better get the word out here because I had not seen it here.
But I guess I was heads down on day job when the discussion was
happening.
TTFN,
-bd-
On Aug 7, 2006, at 7:26 AM, Gentry, Michael (Contractor) wrote:
Unless I'm missing a subtle difference, these are the changes we did a
few weeks back immediately after 1.2 was released. I even used
mogrify
to add a "See http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 for license
information." comment to the images. There wasn't enough room to
store
the entire license as a comment, so I improvised a bit (there was no
direction on how to handle this in the FAQ/etc).
Thanks,
/dev/mrg
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Dudney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 12:42 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: headers discussion
HI All,
One last thread tonight...
I wanted to give everyone a heads up to something I just noticed [1].
It is a new policy for the license comments in src files.
The discussion is happening on the leagal-discuss [2] lists now as to
what time frame this will be required in. I've read Sep 1st and that
it might be postponed but either way I think we will have to conform
before the 3.0 release is ready to go.
Anyone have any bandwidth to tackle this change?
TTFN,
-bd-
[1]http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
[2]http://tinyurl.com/m6x3u
