Electrical current is a 4-vector, is it not?

> Correct! - and an alternating electric current is represented as a
> complex number (then it's conventional to use the symbol 'j' for
> sqrt(-1) to avoid confusion with 'i', the symbol for electric
> current!).  Since as you say electric current is a scalar not a
> vector, then a complex number has to be a scalar, not a vector!
>
> Cheers
>
> -- Ian
>
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Ganesh Natrajan <natra...@embl.fr> wrote:
>> The definition of a vector as being something that has 'magnitude' and
>> 'direction' is actually incorrect. If that were to be the case, a
>> quantity like electric current would be a vector and not a scalar.
>> Electric current is a scalar.
>>
>> A vector is something that transforms like the coordinate system, while
>> a scalar does not. In other words, if you were to transform the
>> coordinate system by a certain operator, a vector quantity in the old
>> coordinate system can be transformed into the new one by using exactly
>> the same operator. This is the correct definition of a vector.
>>
>> G.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 10:22:59 -0400, Ed Pozharski
>> <epozh...@umaryland.edu> wrote:
>>> The definition game is on! :)
>>>
>>> Vectors are supposed to have direction and amplitude, unlike scalars.
>>> Curiously, one can take a position that real numbers are vectors too,
>>> if
>>> you consider negative and positive numbers having opposite directions
>>> (and thus subtraction is simply a case of addition of a negative
>>> number).  And of course, both scalars and vectors are simply tensors,
>>> of
>>> zeroth and first order :)
>>>
>>> Guess my point is that definitions are a matter of choice in math and
>>> if
>>> vector is defined as an array which must obey addition and scaling
>>> rules
>>> (but there is no fixed multiplication rule - regular 3D vectors have
>>> more than one possible product), then complex numbers are vectors.  In
>>> a
>>> narrow sense of a real space vectors (the arrow thingy) they are not.
>>> Thus, complex number is a Vector, but not the vector (futile attempt at
>>> using articles by someone organically suffering from article dyslexia).
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Ed.
>>>
>>>
>>> O
>> --
>> **********************************************
>> Blow, blow, thou winter wind
>> Thou art not so unkind
>> As man's ingratitude;
>> Thy tooth is not so keen,
>> Because thou art not seen,
>> Although thy breath be rude.
>>
>> -William Shakespeare
>> **********************************************
>>
>

Reply via email to