I'd like to add the under-underdog then, Tim Fenn's povscript+ https://sites.google.com/site/timfenn/povscript. Makes really clear and nice figures and is rather simple to compile. For the most part you do not even need a mouse to use it ...

Michael


On 23.04.2014 18:21, mark.x.brooks wrote:
And to stick up for the underdog, try Chimera from UCSF, which also has been coming along nicely (understatement!): http://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/chimera/

Mark

On 23 Apr 2014, at 17:48, Jim Fairman <fairman....@gmail.com <mailto:fairman....@gmail.com>> wrote:

To the best of my knowledge the source code is still available on Sourceforge: http://sourceforge.net/projects/pymol/

You should be able to compile binaries for the OS of your choice from there.

That being said, CCP4MG has been coming along nicely in recent years - at this point I'm 50:50 between Pymol and CCP4MG for making figures for presentations/papers.

Cheers, Jim


On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Cygler, Miroslaw <miroslaw.cyg...@usask.ca <mailto:miroslaw.cyg...@usask.ca>> wrote:

    Hi,
    I have inquired at Schrodinger about the licensing for PyMol. I
    was surprised by their answer. The access to PyMol is only
    through a yearly licence. They do not offer the option of
    purchasing the software and using the obtained version without
    time limitation. This policy is very different from many other
    software packages, which one can use without continuing licensing
    fees and additional fees are only when an upgrade is needed. At
    least I believe that Office, EndNote, Photoshop and others are
    distributed this way.
    I also remember very vividly the Warren’s reason for developing
    PyMol, and that was the free access to the source code. He later
    implemented fees for downloading binary code specific for one’s
    operating system but there were no time restrictions on its use.
    As far as I recollect, Schrodinger took over PyMol distribution
    and development promising to continue in the same spirit. Please
    correct me if I am wrong.
    I find the constant yearly licensing policy disturbing and will
    be looking for alternatives. I would like to hear if you have had
    the same experience and what you think about the Schrodinger policy.
    Best wishes,

    Mirek






--
Jim Fairman, Ph D.
Crystal Core Leader I
Emerald Bio <http://www.embios.com>
Tel: 206-780-8914
Cell: 240-479-6575
E-mail: fairman....@gmail.com <mailto:fairman....@gmail.com> jfair...@embios.com <mailto:jfair...@embios.com>

Reply via email to