Hi Eleanor, what you say is of course true, particularly in the case of the 1st dataset where probably the indices go down to 52 Ang. but the measurements only start at 36 Ang. But still it's hard to see how for the 2nd dataset, if the low res cut-off of the indices and/or measurements is 57 Ang., it manages to 'use' a reflection at 104 Ang. All depends what you mean by 'use' of course!
Cheers -- Ian On 26 July 2017 at 11:33, Eleanor Dodson <eleanor.dod...@york.ac.uk> wrote: > The resolution limits of the measured data are not changed but your output > file must contain all possible h k l even if there is no observations for > the lowest resolution ones.. > > dont worry about it! > > Eleanor > > On 26 July 2017 at 08:36, Andrew Marshall <andrew.c.marshall@adelaide. > edu.au> wrote: > >> Dear crystallographers, >> >> I have two datasets that were merged/scaled using ccp4's aimless, with >> resolution ranges of 52-1.7 and 57-1.9. However, upon refinement, the >> resolution range used by phenix.refine is 36-1.7 for one and 104-1.9 for >> the other. 1) Why does phenix.refine change the low resolution limits of my >> processed data? 2) How can I prevent this? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Andrew >> > >
