>>That said, model phases are not so bad. In fact, in all my experiments with >>fake data the model-phased 2mFo-DFc map always has the best correlation to >>the "true" map. If you substitute the "true" phases and use the 2mFo-DFc >>coefficients you actually make things worse. Counter-intuitive, but true.
I don't understand what you mean by true and fake here--can you clarify? How are the true map and phases generated (from an original true model, I assume?), and how are the fake data generated? (Also from the true model?) I am wondering whether there is some circular reasoning? JPK ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
