On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Ian Murray <murra...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > >The dates are likely based on when the ISO was actually created. > Therefore, if the ISO was generated on Oct. 1st and no issues were found > with it in QA, then the date you are seeing on the mirrors is correct. The > ISOs are based on the original 5.4 tree and don't include updates that Red > Hat released after the initial release of RHEL 5.4. > > As far as I remember, some subsequent RH updates are rolled-into the CentOS > release. Someone more familiar with the build process may clarify that. > > > You could be right. I didn't think they were but I'm not incredibly familiar with the entire rebuild process. Matt -- Mathew S. McCarrell Clarkson University '10 mccar...@gmail.com mccar...@clarkson.edu 1-518-314-9214
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
