Just audit the source code... 7.1.2014 16.42 kirjoitti "Steve Clark" <scl...@netwolves.com>:
> What about selinux - wasn't that originally done by the NSA? > > On 01/07/2014 09:04 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > John Doe wrote: > >> After all the news about backdoors, "planted" bugs or weakened standards > >> in apps, in routers, hardware firmwares, etc... these days, can we trust > >> anything? > >> Can we trust the bios? > >> > >> Can we trust the compiler not to stealthily inject a backdoor in the > >> compiled version of a clean code?Given that most entries from the The > >> International Obfuscated C Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/) > > One thing on the positive side: the last few months, I think a *lot* of > > folks are eyeballing this stuff, specifically looking for issues, and > > probably some are going back to things that they said "I dunno... but > I'll > > come back to look at this someday". I *suspect* that within about six > > months, it'll be as relatively safe as it was maybe 10 years ago. > > > > Of course, we'll need some wakeup call to look at it all again in 10 > > years. In the meantime, I think things are getting safer, relatively. > > > > Hmmmm, speaking of BIOS, wonder if this will impact the push for UEFI.... > > > > mark > > > > _______________________________________________ > > CentOS mailing list > > CentOS@centos.org > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > > > -- > Stephen Clark > *NetWolves* > Director of Technology > Phone: 813-579-3200 > Fax: 813-882-0209 > Email: steve.cl...@netwolves.com > http://www.netwolves.com > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
