I have never had a problem with it either.
To support my argument, from the FAQ about
windows....
"Warning: Apache on NT has not yet been optimized for performance. Apache
still performs best, and is most reliable on Unix platforms. Over time NT
performance has improved, and great progress is being made in the upcoming
version 2.0 of Apache for the Windows platforms. Folks doing comparative
reviews of webserver performance are still asked to compare against Apache
on a Unix platform such as Solaris, FreeBSD, or Linux."
Now it also says everything prior to 1.3.15 should
be considered beta quality. I realize it is stable
and I have never had ANY problems with Apache on
my windows machine either. I would still be wary
in a windows environment with Apache if your seeing
scalability or stability issues. They even say it
is "most reliable" on Unix platforms implying there
may not be equal reliability on a Windows platform.
Thanks
Jeremy Allen
elliptIQ Inc.
--
http://www.neighborware.com
America's Leading Community Network Software
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Justin Greene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 3:14 PM
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: RE: cf and apache
>
>
>The most recent win32 release (1.3.20) is considered initial
>release quality
>and it works great. Never a problem.
>
>Justin
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jeremy Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 10:29 AM
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: RE: cf and apache
>
>Apache does not officialy support Apache Web Server on windows.
>Apache was designed for Unix from the ground up, it is just
>incredibly portable so it made its way to windows.
>
>Consider it (really good) beta quality software.
>
>Jeremy Allen
>elliptIQ Inc.
>--
>http://www.neighborware.com
>America's Leading Community Network Software
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Jeffry Houser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 1:05 PM
>>To: CF-Talk
>>Subject: Re: cf and apache
>>
>>
>> I love it, and use it on my development machine.
>> Although if memory serves me... there were some problems with
>>scalability
>>on Windows units. I can't speak from experience, nor can I point to
>>numbers though.
>>
>>
>>At 02:53 PM 09/21/2001 +0100, you wrote:
>>>How much experience do people have with CF and Apache? Anything
>>to be aware
>>>of if switching from IIS. We are just about to buy a new box and with all
>>>these nightmares people are having with nimba etc thought it
>>might be a good
>>>idea.
>>>
>>>Ben
>>>
>>>
>>>----------------------------------------------------------
>>>Ben Whalley, Radley Yeldar
>>>326 City Road, London, EC1V 2SP
>>>----------------------------------------------------------
>>>0207 7130038
>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>www.ry.com
>>>----------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>* This message has been processed by MailGuard SMTP from NET-TEL
>>>* Computer Systems Ltd. See <http://www.mailguard.co.uk>.
>>>
>>
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
