I remember Sean Corfield wrote a few months that the CF's debugging timings
are only accurate to within 15ms or so. Which makes sense, because i
typically see either 0ms, 15 or 16ms, and then 31ms. So i think the only way
to get somewhat of a handle on how long a process actually takes is to turn
off debugging (because that takes processing time itself, especially for
CFC's) and run it in a loop and then divide by the number of interations.
Even then, you only get an indication. Actual performance can only be gauged
by stress testing a completed app, because there are so many other factors
at play in the actual multithreaded environment that these things run in
that do not surface with our simple straight-line measurements.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Dave Watts
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 12:44 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [CFCDev] cfc or code better?


> and some have 10ms and some have 0ms ...

That's just CF's wacky way of saying these took an insignificant amount of
time. CF isn't good at tracking intervals smaller than 10ms, if I recall
correctly.

Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/

Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized
instruction at our training centers in Washington DC, Atlanta,
Chicago, Baltimore, Northern Virginia, or on-site at your location.
Visit http://training.figleaf.com/ for more information!

----------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev'
in the message of the email.

CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported
by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com).

An archive of the CFCDev list is available at
www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]



----------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' 
in the message of the email.

CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported
by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com).

An archive of the CFCDev list is available at 
www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to