Just as a quick FYI - I've said on multiple occasions that I don't consider the _format_ of CFCs in BlogCFC to be great. It was my very first CFC based application, and I'd write it pretty differently now. THe problem is - with the huge install base I have now and with needing to support CF6/7/BD, it is something I don't want to muck with.
Not a great excuse I know... but... if you want to learn CFC development there are probably better resources out there than BlogCFC. (Although I am -very- proud of the application as a whole. :) On 9/4/06, Paul Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nando wrote: > instantiation. Even a misplaced copy/paste will run." And everyone on > the list went "yuck ... bad practice". actually i as referring to sean's latest comments on this style. i don't recall anybody saying "yuck" about this in 2003 (or was it 2004) ;-) You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, please follow the instructions at http://www.cfczone.org/listserv.cfm CFCDev is supported by: Katapult Media, Inc. We are cool code geeks looking for fun projects to rock! www.katapultmedia.com An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
-- =========================================================================== Raymond Camden, Vice President of Technology for roundpeg Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blog : ray.camdenfamily.com AOL IM : cfjedimaster Video game player? Have kids? Check out KidGamers.org You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, please follow the instructions at http://www.cfczone.org/listserv.cfm CFCDev is supported by: Katapult Media, Inc. We are cool code geeks looking for fun projects to rock! www.katapultmedia.com An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
