I know this was largely about BlogCFC and the RB CFC therein, but just to let you know about another alternative blog you might want to study, I've been working on MachBlog for the last few months with Paul's help on the i18n side: http://www.machblog.org
Different style of development that could provide some insight on some other ways to use CFCs. Public beta should be very soon, but if you want to get on the alpha before that feel free to email me. Matt On 9/5/06, Phillip Senn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But one of the selling points to cfcs is that you can refactor the cfcs without having to change the calling code. In my example (other than adding an .init to 1 line), the application staid the same. BlogCFC is becoming the defacto standard for ColdFusion developers. I know I'm learning a lot by looking through it. And since you already have it in subversion, it makes sense that the community can step in and start polishing. The alternative is for someone to start a blog from scratch, to which we would eventually end up with the same problem. Are you ready for the next evolution? -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Raymond Camden Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 9:59 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [CFCDEV] resourceBundle.cfc Just as a quick FYI - I've said on multiple occasions that I don't consider the _format_ of CFCs in BlogCFC to be great. It was my very first CFC based application, and I'd write it pretty differently now. THe problem is - with the huge install base I have now and with needing to support CF6/7/BD, it is something I don't want to muck with. Not a great excuse I know... but... if you want to learn CFC development there are probably better resources out there than BlogCFC. (Although I am -very- proud of the application as a whole. :) On 9/4/06, Paul Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nando wrote: > > instantiation. Even a misplaced copy/paste will run." And everyone on > > the list went "yuck ... bad practice". > > actually i as referring to sean's latest comments on this style. i don't recall > anybody saying "yuck" about this in 2003 (or was it 2004) ;-) > > > You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, please follow the instructions at http://www.cfczone.org/listserv.cfm > > CFCDev is supported by: > Katapult Media, Inc. > We are cool code geeks looking for fun projects to rock! > www.katapultmedia.com > > An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] > > -- =========================================================================== Raymond Camden, Vice President of Technology for roundpeg Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blog : ray.camdenfamily.com AOL IM : cfjedimaster Video game player? Have kids? Check out KidGamers.org You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, please follow the instructions at http://www.cfczone.org/listserv.cfm CFCDev is supported by: Katapult Media, Inc. We are cool code geeks looking for fun projects to rock! www.katapultmedia.com An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, please follow the instructions at http://www.cfczone.org/listserv.cfm CFCDev is supported by: Katapult Media, Inc. We are cool code geeks looking for fun projects to rock! www.katapultmedia.com An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
-- Matt Woodward [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mattwoodward.com You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, please follow the instructions at http://www.cfczone.org/listserv.cfm CFCDev is supported by: Katapult Media, Inc. We are cool code geeks looking for fun projects to rock! www.katapultmedia.com An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
