Definitely 2. I'm not sure if patches are being released for 1 anymore and the documentation on the website is for 2 only. Many people, including Joe Rinehart, are confused about the project that I'm working on that is based on 1 because 2 is so much better. It has Coldspring wired in and some other stuff. But not having any documentation for 1, especially after I asked for some, is a turn off for me.
You can not have a standard without documentation. People can't follow rules or guideliness unless they are given them. On 2/17/07, Jim Cassata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also, if I am to take the plunge, should I go MG 1.1 or 2beta? You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, please follow the instructions at http://www.cfczone.org/listserv.cfm CFCDev is supported by: Katapult Media, Inc. We are cool code geeks looking for fun projects to rock! www.katapultmedia.com An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
-- "You see, animals have no souls whatsoever! That's what makes it so tasty when we eat or drink them." Mrs. Orel Now blogging.... http://www.blivit.org/blog/index.cfm http://www.blivit.org/mr_urc/index.cfm You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, please follow the instructions at http://www.cfczone.org/listserv.cfm CFCDev is supported by: Katapult Media, Inc. We are cool code geeks looking for fun projects to rock! www.katapultmedia.com An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
