...I thought I would bring attention to CGI::Framework, a project which shares some goals with CGI::Application.
http://search.cpan.org/perldoc?CGI::Framework
I haven't tried it myself.
Mark
I took a brief look of it to get a feel for some of the decisions made by its author.
Right away I saw the following sentence in the man page:
Templates should have the .html extension.
This strikes me as a rather poor decision, and turns me off.
IMHO, it is a poor practice to use the same extension for two different purposes. For example, I may have Apache configured so that it will trap any attempt to directly access a template, which has the extension, ".tmpl". Using ".html" for both static html pages and templates would make such a configuration impossible.
Ok, maybe I am biased because I am sold on CGI::Application. :-)
Pete
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Web Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cgiapp&r=1&w=2 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
