Just one more comment/question here. Other modules that use a plugin style architecture usually put them into a ::Plugin namespace (ie, Template::Plugin::DBI). Should we consider doing that here if we are serious about hording up a lot of plugins? Should CGI::Application::TT become CGI::Application::Plugin::TT?
I agree, and if you look in the docs for CGI::Application::Plugin, the example uses that convention.
I don't know how many people are using CGI::Application::Session, but I could be convinced to move it at some point.
As for CGI::Application::TT, I haven't released that on CPAN yet, so it shouldn't be a problem. I didn't get much feedback on it so I am guessing no one is using it anyway.
Cheers,
Cees
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Web Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cgiapp&r=1&w=2 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
